|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
![]() |
Art | Animation | News | Contact | Site Map | Home | Journal |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
Email Petitions and Why They are Ineffective29 January 2003 (updated 03 February 2003) I received an email petition from a well-meaning friend and colleague recently. I decided to post my rant against such petitions here since I get a lot of these things, and I'd like to see an end to them. The email had no subject line so it was only because the message came from a trusted source that it made it through my spam filters. I've included the text of the message verbatim at the end of this page, but I've cut the 400-odd names of people who had already added their names to this virtual petition. For those of you who don't want to read through any of the various language versions, the basic intent of the petition is to get the UN to stop the United States from going to war with Iraq. [It turns out that the petition is a hoax. Lower down on this page there are links to sites with information about the hoax.] <rant> Petitions like this tend to have the opposite effect of what is intended or more likely no effect at all: the final recipient often has to shut down the email address in question because it is so flooded with incoming traffic and as a result, the message is lost. [It turns out that the UN shut down the email address in question.] Imagine what would happen if I was the 599th person to sign this message and then forward it to, say, the 90-odd people in my email address book. If even 5 of my friends forward the petition to the UN, the UN will receive 5 lists of 600 people that are identical except for the last signature. It's way more noise than signal. Additionally, because this message has already made the email rounds hundreds of times, skeptics among us may wonder about the authenticity of the request. Did the UN actually request signatures on a petition? Yes, the message needs to be sent, and email is easy and almost instant. A non-virtual petition organizer would be unlikely to mail out 10 letters asking people to sign, and then asking those 10 people to sign 10 copies and send them out and so on, with the 600 signatory of each letter sending a bound volume to the UN, expecting them to sort through the duplication. [It turns out that purported originators of the petition, the United Nations Information Centre have never started any petitions. You can their notice about the petition here. </rant> Alternatives:I found the following sites (and more) with a simple google search for petition against war in iraq. Click the link to see the current search results.
It's a Hoax (added 03 February 2003)It turns out that the email message in question is indeed yet another example of an internet-age hoax and chain letter. You can read about it here:
Here's the original message:
Please read through the bottom. |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Art |
Animation |
News |
Contact |
Site Map |
Home |
Journal
Copyright © 1997-2007 Spiral Dragon Art and Design. All rights reserved. |